What Is Ceramix-Nano? Shining 3D's Capsule 3D Printer for Ceramic Crowns

Chairside printing has had a credibility problem for years. The resins were not strong enough for permanent work, the printers were bulky, and the post-processing added steps no busy operatory wanted. The capsule printer category, led so far by the SprintRay Midas, is the industry's answer to that, and the Ceramix-Nano is Shining 3D's entry into it.

It is a small, capsule-fed printer built to turn a scan into a permanent ceramic-resin restoration in about half an hour, with the curing step built into the same box. Here is what it actually does, where the technology is genuinely different, and where the open questions still are.

Specifications at a glance

A printer the size of a coffee pod

The first thing to understand about the Ceramix-Nano is how small it is. It weighs 4.5 lb (2 kg) and stands about 10.87 in tall on a 3.43 × 5.16 in base. That is closer to a benchtop appliance than a traditional dental 3D printer, and it changes where the device can live: on a counter in the operatory rather than in a separate lab space.

Shining 3D also supports running it from a 10,000 mAh+ power bank, which gives several print-and-cure cycles without a wall outlet. That is a niche feature for most practices, but it tells you how the machine is positioned: a portable, self-contained restoration unit rather than a shared lab printer.

APS: why a capsule printer needs a different engine

Most desktop dental printers use conventional DLP or LCD, where each layer requires the build platform to peel away from the FEP film. With high-viscosity, heavily ceramic-filled material, those peel forces become a real problem, and the small capsule format leaves no room for a conventional resin vat.

Shining 3D's answer is APS (Adaptive Pneumatic Stereolithography), a pneumatic system designed specifically to print high-viscosity capsule resin reliably. You do not have to follow the engineering to take the point: APS is what makes a ceramic-filled resin printable in a format this small. It is the core reason the Nano is not just a shrunk-down version of an existing printer.

The capsule system

Material comes in prefilled LumiCera capsules instead of an open resin vat. There is no measuring, no mixing, and no tank to pour or clean between cases. A single capsule prints up to three single crowns, and the chamber accommodates bridges up to about 1.5 in in length, so it is not strictly single-unit.

The trade-off is the same one every capsule system carries: convenience over per-unit material cost. Capsules are a fixed-format consumable, so the savings are in workflow and waste, not in raw resin price. For a chairside operatory that values turnaround and simplicity, that is usually the right trade. For a high-volume lab optimizing cost per unit, it may not be.

Integrated curing

The curing chamber is built into the printer. After a print, the restoration cures on-machine in about 3 minutes at up to 176°F (80°C), at roughly 200 mW/cm². Removing the separate cure box is a bigger deal than it sounds, because a standalone curing unit is one more device, one more transfer step, and one more thing to maintain. Folding it into the printer is what keeps the whole workflow on one bench.

LumiCera CB200: the material, and the honest question

The restoration is only as good as the resin. LumiCera CB200 is a high-ceramic capsule resin made for the Nano, with over 55% ceramic filler and a reported flexural strength near 200 MPa. It is FDA Class II 510(k) cleared (K260170) and comes in five VITA shades: BL, A1, A2, B1, and C2.

Two honest caveats. First, the material launches in a low-translucency formulation, which is well suited to posterior crowns but more limiting for high-aesthetic anterior cases. Second, the broader industry is still divided on whether 3D-printed resin crowns are a fully equivalent permanent restorative material versus milled ceramics. The specs are strong for a printable resin, but long-term clinical track record is the open question, and it is worth weighing for the case types you would actually bring in-house.

Shining Flow: the workflow that makes it usable

The hardware was never the only barrier to chairside printing. Software was. Most clinicians are not going to learn a full CAD package to design a single crown. Shining Flow is the connected workflow built to remove that: scan the prep, send the case for AI-assisted design (Shining 3D reports a design in under 2 minutes), let the cloud handle nesting and slicing, then print and cure.

The reported print times are 7–8 minutes for an anterior unit and 9–11 minutes for a posterior, plus the 3-minute cure, which is how Shining 3D arrives at an end-to-end chairside workflow of about 30 minutes. The value here is not any single step. It is that scanning, design, printing, and curing are meant to run as one path instead of four disconnected tools.

Where it fits the chairside printer market

Capsule printing is becoming its own category. The SprintRay Midas (around $10,995) has the head start and the most mature restorative material ecosystem; Asiga's PrintPods and others are moving into the same space. The Ceramix-Nano enters as a smaller, lower-footprint option with an aggressively integrated print-and-cure design.

If you are comparing options, the Nano's argument is compactness, an all-in-one curing workflow, and Shining 3D's AI design path. The counter-argument from the incumbents is a longer, more proven materials track record. Both points are fair, and which matters more depends on how much you value being an early adopter versus a follower on a still-maturing material category.

Browse all Shining 3D printers and scanners →